Every result has to answer four questions: which requirement, which configuration version, under what conditions, and what it supports. Simulation, methods and verification are presented separately, never blended.
Mission simulation checks reach, task order, support and contact conditions. Its conclusions depend on the model and assumptions and are not hardware or in-orbit verification.
Alternate anchoring on cooperative interfaces, relocation, tool and module handling.
Reach in confined bays, viewpoint selection and task order.
Concept renderConcept for coordinated handling, relative alignment and structural joining.
For low-power fine manipulation that does not depend on precise initial positioning: we break tasks into an observe–act–check loop, package grasping, docking and assembly into reusable skills, and use contact constraints to converge on alignment.
Task-level stiffness, damping and force are mapped onto joint torque loops and motor current loops, so contact can be sensed and adjusted. Current, temperature and state protection at every level limit abnormal loads.
From requirement to evidence, every link leaves a record.
Object, operation, environment, acceptance
Robot, tools, interfaces, software version
Entry conditions and anomaly handling per step
Conditions, data, conclusion, scope
Experience from earlier space projects in interface integration, test organisation and data traceability now feeds our product verification process.
Studying approach to and capture of rotating targets, and carrying load after capture. This is capability research, run separately from the near-term hosted-robot route, and is not a current service.
For asteroid and similar surfaces: attachment, contact tools and material transfer. Natural surfaces and cooperative interfaces are treated separately and need joint verification with research teams.
Tell us the object, the platform and where your project stands. Together we turn it into a task description, an interface list and a verification scope both sides agree on.
